Archbishop's views on condoms...made me hot.

Is that wrong? Or is it because I'm at my 'peak' and am almost constantly 'excitable' that the following statement by the incoming (*snicker*) Archbishop of Westminster, The Most Rev Vincent Nichols, touched me:

"Existing condom advertisements "demean" young people by promoting "drunken fuckery" and "casual anal sex on the street corner."

and...

"At the end of most modern-day sexual encounters, the man will finish by removing the condom and ejaculating over his lover’s face, buttocks or breasts… There is little point in even using a condom anymore, and it is no longer compatible with contemporary sexual practices."

Now, while I have limited experience with 'drunken fuckery on street corners' (limited, as in...none at all), I do have to say that this guy knows a lot more about sexual practices than I would like to admit.

But I guess my point it, WTF is he thinking? And what, exactly, is the other option if condoms aren't 'suitable' for 21st century sex? They've worked at a 100% level for me for the past 10 years. Should I be standing up as proof that they work as advertised? STD free and baby-free (no babies in 10 years=awesome!) should be good PR, right?

Read on for more info on his somewhat biased views of sex in the 21st century.

More.